Skip to main content

What are you looking for?

Explore our services and discover how we can help you achieve your goals

Help desk and B2B CRM operations in one workflow

Partner support tickets, sales chats, leads, quotes and project follow-up often live in separate tools that never agree on where an account actually stands. This page scopes a single help desk and B2B CRM workflow, with AI triage and a knowledge base kept under human review, that holds all of it as one system of record.

Submit a project See the related service

Reviewed by David Nguyen (CEO) · Updated 1 Oct 2026

star

Who shares this record

  • Support staff work tickets raised by partners and business clients, not consumer chat volume.
  • Sales staff carry the same accounts through chats, qualification, quotes and follow-up.
  • Project leads track milestones and objectives for accounts that have moved from sale to delivery.
  • Account owners need one place that shows a partner's open tickets, live quotes and project status together, because the next conversation depends on all three.
  • Administrators maintain the knowledge base articles that both the AI triage layer and human agents draw on.

Where split tools cost you accounts

A ticket in one tool, a quote in a spreadsheet and a project plan in a third system mean nobody can answer "where does this partner actually stand" without opening all three. A renewal conversation starts cold because the account owner never saw the open support ticket. A quote stalls because the salesperson does not know a ticket already flagged the same issue. Reporting on support load, pipeline and delivery status needs three exports stitched together by hand, so it happens rarely and late.

The target workflow

  1. Intake

    Partner tickets, sales chats and inbound leads arrive into one dashboard rather than three inboxes.

  2. AI triage

    Each item is classified by type and urgency and, where confidence is high, answered from the knowledge base; the source of any automated answer is recorded.

  3. Assignment and tracking

    Tickets are assigned, prioritised and tracked against a response target; sales items move into qualification, quoting or nurturing on the same account record.

  4. Quotes and proposals

    A quote or custom proposal is built against the account's history, so pricing context and prior commitments are visible before it goes out.

  5. Project handover

    Once sold, the account continues into a project platform with milestones and objective tracking, so delivery status sits beside the ticket and quote history rather than in a separate tool.

  6. Reporting

    Support analytics, sales performance analytics and project status read from the same account record, so one report answers "where does this partner stand" without a manual join.

Where this solution ends and support automation begins

Customer support automation automates the inbound conversation up to a defined escalation point: intent classification, an automated answer and a handoff with context. This page picks up from there and from the sales side: it is the system of record that holds the ticket, the chat, the lead, the quote and the project once a person or the AI triage layer has acted. A business running only consumer support volume, with no B2B accounts, quotes or project follow-up to track, is usually served by the support workflow alone.

Choosing the first scope

  • Partner tickets and sales chats already exist in separate tools you want unified

    Support volume is purely consumer-facing with no account or quote history to track

  • Quotes and proposals need the ticket and chat history behind them to be accurate

    A single spreadsheet of a handful of accounts still works for everyone involved

  • Delivered projects need their milestones visible next to the account's support and sales record

    The team has not yet agreed who owns the account view, which stalls adoption regardless of tooling

Data and integrations

The objects to design are the account, the ticket, the chat transcript, the lead, the quote or proposal, the knowledge base article with its version, and the project with its milestones. Each needs an owner and a defined behaviour when a sync between systems is uncertain, since a half-updated account record is worse than a stale one.

  • Netbase works with commercial and open-source AI models chosen per project; no vendor partnership is implied.
  • Role-based access control and multi-factor authentication apply to admin dashboards, with contributors under NDA.
  • Netbase delivers remote-first from Hanoi in Agile increments with weekly reviews, using AI-assisted engineering under human review.

Delivery modules

Netbase deploys a help desk and B2B CRM for business partners that brings sales chats and client requests into one dashboard, with ticket creation, assignment, prioritisation and tracking, support reporting and analytics, workflow automation, a knowledge base, lead capture, scoring and nurturing, sales collaboration and quotes, sales performance analytics, a project platform with milestones and objective tracking, and a custom proposal system. Each module is a milestone with its own acceptance test:

  • Intake and triage: one dashboard, AI classification, confidence thresholds and the knowledge base it answers from.
  • Ticketing: creation, assignment, prioritisation, tracking and support reporting.
  • CRM: lead capture, scoring, nurturing, sales collaboration and quotes.
  • Reporting: sales performance analytics alongside support analytics on the same account.
  • Project follow-up: a project platform with milestones and objective tracking, and a custom proposal system.

Rollout

Stage one maps the current tools and the fields each one owns, so the account, ticket, quote and project objects are agreed before anything is built. Stage two builds intake, triage and ticketing first, since that is where the volume and the escalation risk sit. Stage three adds the CRM and quoting layer once ticket history is flowing into the same account record. Stage four connects the project platform so a sold account keeps its support and sales history visible through delivery.

Risks

  • A confident wrong triage

    Sample AI-classified items from day one rather than trusting the dashboard's confidence score alone.

  • An unowned knowledge base

    An article with no reviewer and no review date becomes the source of a future wrong answer.

  • Reporting built on stale exports

    If sales, support and project data are not on one record, "performance" numbers quietly disagree between teams.

  • Quotes issued blind to open tickets

    A proposal that ignores an unresolved complaint on the same account damages the relationship it is meant to grow.

How success is measured

Track response time and resolution rate by ticket type; the share of chats and tickets triaged automatically against the share escalated, with reasons; quote cycle time from request to sent; how often a project kickoff starts with support and sales history already visible to the delivery team; and how current the knowledge base is against the tickets it is meant to resolve. These are your numbers, on your account record.

Who runs this workflow

The workflow fits organisations whose business clients generate a mix of support tickets, sales conversations and delivered projects on the same account: agencies, consultancies, software vendors with partner channels, and firms in professional services with a client desk and a pipeline to manage together. It does not fit a purely consumer support queue with no account, quote or delivery history to track, which is better served by customer support automation on its own.

Proof from delivery

For a client who is not named, Netbase built a WhatsApp Business AI chatbot with intent and conversation-flow handling, a large language model API with GPT-4 in the stack, and CRM synchronisation for lead capture, customer data and workflow automation, delivered in milestones from design and prototype to documentation, knowledge transfer and 30 days of support, over four to eight weeks. Netbase has also delivered anonymised client AI projects including retrieval-based knowledge assistants, document AI and MLOps pipelines, the pattern this page's triage and knowledge-base layer draws on.

The closest published example of the CRM side of this workflow is the multi-tenant cloud ERP SaaS platform, where Netbase worked as offshore development and managing partner on a system covering CRM, real-time messaging, HR, knowledge base, custom fields and workflows, and work and project management for a US client that is not named. The full chatbot record is the WhatsApp AI chatbot and CRM integration page.

Multi-tenant cloud ERP SaaS platform
Multi-tenant cloud ERP SaaS platform

Since 2020, Netbase has worked as offshore development and managing partner on a multi-tenant cloud ERP that a US software company offers as SaaS to small and mid-sized businesses.

Keep Reading
WhatsApp AI chatbot with CRM integration
WhatsApp AI chatbot with CRM integration

Netbase designed and built an AI chatbot on WhatsApp Business that handles intents and conversation flows and keeps lead and customer data in step with the client's CRM, delivered in milestones from prototype to knowledge transfer.

Keep Reading

Common questions

It can run as the system of record in place of separate tools, or as the connective layer between ones you keep; the scoping brief states which.

You do. A named owner and review date are part of the delivery, and the audit trail shows which answer came from which article version.

The item routes to a person with the classified type, confidence score and account history attached, rather than being answered automatically.

Yes; the platform tracks milestones and objectives for your own delivery work, independent of who built the underlying project.

Access, retention and what may be sent to an external model are defined before the architecture, consistent with Netbase's security practice of role-based access, multi-factor authentication on admin dashboards and NDAs on request.

Remote-first from Netbase's only office, in Hanoi; a site visit is scoped separately when a pilot needs one.

AI workflow automation with evaluation and human control AI workflow automation with evaluation and human control

One operating workflow automated, with an agreed way to judge it and a person on uncertain cases.

Learn More
line

Scope this workflow

Bring the tools you currently use for tickets, chats, quotes and project tracking, and the accounts where they already disagree. The commercial route is AI Workflow Automation, set within the wider AI workflow automation guide, which also covers where a person stays in the loop and the companion AI knowledge assistant workflow for the triage layer's source material. Other workflows are listed under solutions. When ready, submit a project brief. OutsourcingVN is operated by Netbase JSC and is Netbase's own outsourcing-services platform.

Tell us what you want to build or automate.

Submit a project