Who writes and reviews OutsourcingVN
Every page here carries two names: Netbase Editorial Team as author, David (CEO) as reviewer. Content is drafted by the editorial team with AI assistance under human review, and David is the final approver for every public claim on the site. This page sets out what that approval checks, and the four things it is not.
Submit a project Read the methodologyReviewed by David (CEO) · Updated 25 Sep 2026
The two names on every page
David is Chairman, founder and CEO of Netbase JSC, the company that operates this site. That is the whole of what is attested about him here. This page adds no career history, no qualification and no membership, because the claim register holds none for any individual, and an unverifiable biography would undercut the only thing this page is for. He is the named reviewer and the final approver of every public claim. Approval is a decision a person owns; it is not delegated to a tool.
Netbase Editorial Team is the group inside Netbase JSC that drafts and maintains these pages. Drafting is AI-assisted, and every draft passes human review before it reaches the reviewer. Where a page describes technical work, the draft is read by the roles that do that work: project teams draw on business analysis, project management, solution architecture, development, QA and UI/UX roles, and the relevant role checks the section that concerns it.
Neither name comes with a photograph. No approved photograph of anyone at Netbase JSC is registered for this site, so this page publishes none rather than illustrate accountability with a stock image. About OutsourcingVN describes the organisation behind both names.
Where the reviewer sits
Netbase JSC was founded in 2012. Its head office is in Hanoi, Vietnam, and it is the company's only office. Netbase has served more than 500 clients; it serves clients in the United States, Europe and Asia-Pacific. Review happens inside that single organisation: OutsourcingVN is operated by Netbase JSC, so the person approving a claim about delivery is also accountable for the delivery business that makes it. That is a conflict of interest. Naming it, and showing the procedure that contains it, is the purpose of this page.
What a review actually consists of
OutsourcingVN records material claims with source, owner and review date, publishes the lower figure on conflict and does not rank competitors. In practice a review runs in this order:
-
Find the row
A material statement about Netbase or OutsourcingVN is publishable only if it already exists as a row in the claim register, with a stable identifier and the exact public wording.
-
Check the source and the access date
Each row names where the fact came from and the date it was last checked, so a reader can see how old the evidence is.
-
Check the owner
Each row names the evidence owner who can confirm or withdraw it.
-
Check the review date
Rows carry a next-review date. The provider comparison framework, for example, is criteria version 1.0, reviewed 2026-09-22, with the next scheduled review in March 2027.
-
Resolve conflicts downward
Where our own materials disagree, the lower or narrower figure is published, and a figure with no method behind it is left out.
-
Keep the registered wording
Some rows must be published in their registered form. Delivery descriptions are one: discovery and strategic alignment; team assembly and architecture planning; agile execution with outcome-based milestones; modular components; training and rollout; ongoing support. A draft that paraphrases that into something warmer is sent back.
-
Decide
Approve, narrow the statement, or remove it.
A claim that reaches its review date without a recheck, or whose source or permission lapses, stops being publishable. The page is corrected, the statement narrowed, or it comes down. It is not left up while someone finds a replacement source. The methodology page sets out the register rules in full.
What this review is not
This is the part worth reading before you rely on anything here.
- It is not an independent audit. The reviewer works for the company the pages describe. Nobody outside Netbase JSC checks these claims before publication.
- It is not an accreditation of any provider, including Netbase. This site does not accredit, score or rank suppliers, and a claim passing review says only that a source, an owner and a date exist behind it.
- It is not a legal, tax or security opinion. Pages that touch contracts, intellectual property or data protection describe how projects are usually run. They are not advice for your jurisdiction or your contract.
- It is not a guarantee of a project outcome. A reviewed page describes capability and method. What your project achieves depends on scope, decisions and constraints that no review of a web page can see.
The review covers published statements. It does not audit the delivery of any project, and it does not replace your own due diligence.
How AI is used in this work
Netbase delivers remote-first from Hanoi in Agile increments with weekly reviews, using AI-assisted engineering under human review. The same rule governs this site. AI tools help with research, drafting, consistency checks and formatting. They do not approve a claim, a client permission, a comparison or a publication, and they do not decide what comes down when evidence lapses.
We state this plainly instead of leaving it to be discovered. A disclosed method can be judged; an undisclosed one can only be found out. For the same reason there is no hidden layer of text on this site aimed at machines rather than readers: the structure a reader sees is the structure a search or answer engine gets.
What the editorial team reviews
Rather than list every page, here are the families and what review means in each:
-
Service pages
The boundary of the offer, what is included and what is another route
-
Solution pages
The workflow described, and that no outcome is promised beyond the registered wording
-
Industry pages
That sector language stays descriptive and carries no invented market figure
-
Work records
Anonymisation, client permission, and that no result is reported without evidence
-
Guides
Method, dates, limitations, and that comparisons name no competitor
Corrections
If you believe a statement on OutsourcingVN is wrong or out of date, email [email protected] with the page address and the statement concerned, and a source if you have one. Requests go to the project mailbox the rest of the site uses; the reviewer publishes no personal email address or phone number here.
A person reads every request. The claim row behind the statement is reopened, the source rechecked with a new access date, and the page is corrected, narrowed or taken down. The contact page lists the company's channels, and the privacy notice explains what happens to the details you send.
Common questions
No. He is its founder and CEO. This page exists so that you can weigh the content knowing that, rather than assume an independence nobody here claims.
None are published, because the claim register holds no qualification, membership or accreditation for any individual. Publishing one would breach the rule this page describes.
No photograph of any individual is approved and registered for this site. A face that cannot be verified adds the appearance of accountability without the substance.
No. It means one accountable person approved it against recorded evidence, and will correct it when that evidence changes.
Bring a real project to the same people
The people who approve these pages are the people who scope the work. When you want a real need assessed rather than a page read, submit a project brief and a person will answer. OutsourcingVN is operated by Netbase JSC and is Netbase's own outsourcing-services platform.